Weber vs. Marx Essay -- essays research papers

weber destabilizes the relationship between base and superstructure that Marx had established. harmonise to weber, the concept of historical bodilyism is nave and nonsense because superstructures are non mere reflections of the economic base. (The Protestant Ethic and The Spirit of Capitalism (1904-5) Weber agrees that the providence is one of the most faithful rives in modern purport. nonetheless there are other brotherly and legal factors which exhibit function and thus set society. These factors help define bureaucratic society or Webers concept of modern society which operates through the sharp-witted administration of labor. According to Weber, the condition of modern society is disenchantment, which, through keen-wittedization (division of labor), worldly activity is no longer motivated by pagan or natureual values (meaning) but is instead motivated by economic impulsion. Ironically though, Weber attributes religious aestheticism (meaning) to the root of rational ization, and once mechanics (capitalism) takes off on its own, that religious root is no longer mandatory to justify work. Thus, mechanized petrification emerges, leaving hardly any populate for spontaneity, with a few exceptions. In establishing a definition of modern society, Weber, irrelevant Marx, acknowledges that certain ideas can have great influence on material conditions. He suggests a more complex, dynamic relationship between economy and superstructure. Human activity is motivated by reasons other than just capitalistic consumption. For example, many heap act ground on meaning, such as religious or spiritual. Values shape how people live. Weber accuses Marx of be an economic determinist for believing that the mode of production is the only force that moves the base. Weber believes that social and legal factors such as status, class, party, and the division of social honor from economic order in addition to the economy influence modern society, which, according to Web er, is a bureaucracy organized through the rational administration of labor. Weber believes that human history has been the progressive rationalization of life (modernity). The increased rationalism (measuring/controlling the labor process, ie assembly line) based on logic and calculations instead of traditions, heart, and feeling of modernity le... ... be utilise to promote ones status. An influential politician, for example, has a lot of force not because he has money, but because his decisions impact society at grand and play a very important role in government activity the lives of others. Weber notes that although bureaucratic rationalization has disenchanted the world and its endurance seems inevitable, the spirit has not been completely eradicated. Weber believes that as an advanced society we cannot flow the pattern of rational rules and laws. However, he allows for the arrival of prophets or charismatic people from time to time, those who exhibit good rational adminis tration skills as substantially as heart and passion. While offering no clear solution, Weber leaves us with an optimistic hope for the future and inspiration, perhaps, to emulate those extraordinary leaders of our time.